[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1add2d3334021b508fe96ab0375ee9a3@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:54:44 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation
On 2012-06-17 17:51, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 05:38:01PM +0200, magnum wrote:
>> I built with the -native target so I should have got the same speed as
>> you for Simon's format. But 22600K is the best I get from the
>> fluctuations. Any idea why?
>
> No.
>
>> Is an -xop build different in some way?
>
> It should be the same, but you could want to check the binary.
I checked the code and the behavior of gcc and from what I can see there
should be absolutely no difference with the #ifdefs so this must be
something with the gcc optimizer. But we do get a different
taviso_fmt.o. Maybe I'll dissect them some rainy day.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
