|
Message-ID: <ff7c9fc458a27e6a2204bc63fcf9347d@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:18:31 +0200 From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com> To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: linux-x86-64-native On 2012-06-17 17:09, Solar Designer wrote: > magnum - > > linux-x86-64-native failed to build for me (on bull): > > x86-64.o: In function `DES_bs_crypt': > (.text+0x80): multiple definition of `DES_bs_crypt' > DES_bs_b.o:DES_bs_b.c:(.text+0x1ffa): first defined here > > I think the problem is that -march=native is not passed here: > > gcc -c x86-64.S > > It should be in ASFLAGS as well. Thanks! I got a report from Claudio but thought it was more complicated than that :) Works fine. It turns out Tavis' format is slower than Simon's on AMD: Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [taviso sse4]... DONE Raw: 21566K c/s real, 21566K c/s virtual Benchmarking: Raw SHA-1 [SSE2i 8x]... DONE Raw: 22273K c/s real, 22273K c/s virtual magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.