[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4404018a79489aa3b330407092d85a8f@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 17:16:38 +0200
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [patch] optional new raw sha1 implemetation
But it would crash and burn on a Sparc. I believe it has to be a non-plug.
magnum
On 2012-06-17 17:12, jfoug wrote:
> If this is trivial enough, then we can have the #if logic for SSE4 right
> there, and have both the sse2 and sse4 versions, and then this format can
> once again become a '_plug' type format. This could be done, as long as
> the 2 different versions are simple drop in changes, that do not have too
> much intermix in the other parts of the code.
>
>> I've also written an alternative to the SSE4 compare, it's slower on my
>> machine, but not by much, so you can use it even if you don't have SSE4.
>>
>> I'll try to send you a pull request, but I've never used github before,
>> so please forgive me if I get it wrong.
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
