[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP177656FBA2D959010716B22FDF70@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:26:12 +0200
From: Frank Dittrich <frank_dittrich@...mail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: bash completion
On 06/11/2012 10:42 AM, magnum wrote:
> On 2012-06-11 08:12, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>> On 06/11/2012 02:39 AM, magnum wrote:
>>> On 2012-06-09 17:08, Frank Dittrich wrote:
>>> Was that supposed to fix a redirected "<file" too? I tried it now but it
>>> does not seem to make any difference in either case.
>>
>> No, sorry, my bad.
>>
>> The attached patch fixes it.
>> Also, instead of
>>
>> $ ./unique [tab][tab]
>> giving
>> $ ./unique
>> OUTPUT-FILE [-ex_file=FNAME2]
>> [-inp=fname] [-v]
>> [-cut=len] [-ex_file_only=FNAME2] [-mem=num]
>>
>> for the jumbo version, now you get completion for file names and
>> directories.
>>
>> And I fixed unintended file name completion for -inp= and other options,
>> if the (non-jumbo) unique version doesn't support those.
>
> Not sure what is wrong, still neither works. Could it be something odd
> with my system? (Mint 13 / Ubuntu 12).
>
> ./unique <[TAB][TAB] gives nothing.
>
> magnum
At least the behavior was consistent with john, and for > and 2> and so on.
The attached patch fixes this.
BTW 1:
Could you add
*~
*.patch
to the .gitignore file of your repository?
BTW 2:
How much time is left to send final patches for integration into next jumbo?
Frank
View attachment "0001-Fix-bash-completion-for-input-and-output-redirection.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (914 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
