[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F5E7627.4010802@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:18:15 -0300
From: Claudio André <claudioandre.br@...il.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Forget it, it is working now [was Help on SHA-512]
Ok. And i can wait your experiments on your branch.
Em 12-03-2012 19:10, magnum escreveu:
> On 03/12/2012 10:49 PM, magnum wrote:
>> On 03/12/2012 10:33 PM, magnum wrote:
>>> Actually, what is even more important is that if I say "KPC=8192
>>> LWS=0" you should enumerate LWS using a KPC of 8192. Otherwise this
>>> enumeration could take half an hour or more on CPU.
>>>
>>> ssha-opencl will do that, and I think it is the best OpenCL template
>>> right now.
>> Actually I was wrong, the released version of ssha-opencl does not do
>> that either. I will commit a patch within 5 minutes that fixes this.
> So I did, but now I realise it won't work if you say "KPC=0 LWS=0".
> Anyway, you get the general idea. I need to revisit my experimental
> branch, that one works like a champ. I may have time to test it on GPU
> tomorrow.
>
> magnum
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
