[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8869d6ee559ad3d285f7f263d8774545@smtp.hushmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:10:52 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Forget it, it is working now [was Help on SHA-512]
On 03/12/2012 10:49 PM, magnum wrote:
> On 03/12/2012 10:33 PM, magnum wrote:
>> Actually, what is even more important is that if I say "KPC=8192
>> LWS=0" you should enumerate LWS using a KPC of 8192. Otherwise this
>> enumeration could take half an hour or more on CPU.
>>
>> ssha-opencl will do that, and I think it is the best OpenCL template
>> right now.
>
> Actually I was wrong, the released version of ssha-opencl does not do
> that either. I will commit a patch within 5 minutes that fixes this.
So I did, but now I realise it won't work if you say "KPC=0 LWS=0".
Anyway, you get the general idea. I need to revisit my experimental
branch, that one works like a champ. I may have time to test it on GPU
tomorrow.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
