[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC2D721.70207@hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:18:25 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: more targets using sse-intrinsics.S
2011-11-15 19:49, magnum wrote:
> Speaking of raw SHA1, I think we should add a tag for that one. In fact
> we already have such a tag, namely $dynamic_26$. Like with dynamic, we
> should support reading legacy (untagged) hashes from john.pot but always
> write tags to new entries.
Done, patch 0024. All incremental patches up to and including this one
are regression tested for all builds I can produce:
generic (64-bit)
linux-x86-64-32-any
linux-x86-64-32-mmx
linux-x86-64-32-sse2
linux-x86-64-32-sse2i
linux-x86-64
linux-x86-64i
The same tests was made for my CVS-based tree too (with an additional
salt_hash patch for all formats with hard-coded size). No problems known.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
