[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC2C4C8.8020609@hushmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:00:08 +0100
From: magnum <john.magnum@...hmail.com>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: more targets using sse-intrinsics.S
2011-11-15 19:49, magnum wrote:
> After some digging around in the formats I found that Bartavelle's
> salted-sha1 replaces NSLDAPS (ssha) *and* OPENLDAPS (openssha). The same
> tag {SSHA} is used and it can use both salt lengths, which is apparently
> the only difference between the older ones. I think we should just move
> NSLDAPS and OPENLDAPS to unused.
>
> And NSLDAP_fmt (nsldap) is just raw SHA1 with a '{SHA}' tag and using
> Base64 instead of hex. I think the best thing to "fix" this format is to
> move NSLDAP_fmt to unused and make a new one based on rawSHA1_fmt. I'll
> put that on top of my to-do list, it's a one beer job.
Did all the above in patch #0023.
Now I think only the hmac-md5 format lacks intrinsics, of those that had
32-bit MMX/SSE support.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
