[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DC6598F.3020609@banquise.net>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 10:51:27 +0200
From: Simon Marechal <simon@...quise.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: patches to integrate into jumbo
Le 07/05/2011 18:33, JimF a écrit :
> I do not believe that intrisics as writting (other than in md5_gen) are
> 'ready'. I am pretty sure that intrisics replace most of the formats
> they use, vs working with them IIRC.
It would be easy to just add tons if #ifdefs. On the other hand, with
gen_md5 there is no need to "convert" formats to the intrinsics branch
anymore. There is still the sha1 stuff. I have not been following
patches for a while but I understand this also is in md5_gen.
I have no problem updating the "intrinsics" patch against any tree, as
long as someone points me to the right one. It could also be a good idea
to rename it to something like md5/sha1 intrinsics, as there is also the
DES intrinsics in tree now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
