[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DC5BF0B.9050206@bredband.net>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 23:52:11 +0200
From: magnum <rawsmooth@...dband.net>
To: john-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: patches to integrate into jumbo
On 2011-05-07 23:40, jfoug wrote:
>> IMO it's not to be included in the normal distributions, but it should
>> be packed nicely and used by all contributors. It could even be
>> mentioned in the "how to make patches" page as a mandatory step.
> But, don't most people 'want' a make test? Make test could run
> john -test=1
> and then launch the tstall
Most people would like me and you not to post patches that break things,
and this way, they would not have to test things that much. If I ALWAYS
run tstall for ALL builds I can produce before posting a patch, then
there is good chance a simple john --test is enough for the end user.
If it wasn't 2MB compressed (twice as big as john+jumbo itself) I would
say go. But it's big, and it needs to be big. OTOH the flash ads I get
when just loading my normal news start-page is probably twice that size,
so what the heck, it's 2011. It wont hurt me, I need it anyway.
magnum
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
