[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Jlyzz-0003uE-JW@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:11:55 +0100 (BST)
From: "David A. Holland" <dholland@....linux.org.uk>
To: xvendor@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: "going public"
> > 1. Whos actually on the list?
>
> There are currently 40 subscribers, not counting robot addresses for the
> list archives (local, Gmane, MARC). Most of these people may represent
> various Linux distribution vendors (10+ of them, including several major
> ones), but some may also represent other projects and companies (both
> Open Source and not). I'm not sure if it's appropriate to make the list
> of potentially represented projects and companies public, because people
> were not granting the list admins that right as they were joining.
>
> Let me use this opportunity to ask - does anyone (of the current list
> members) have any objections regarding me publicly mentioning their
> project or company (as derived from the domain name) as being
> "potentially represented" on this mailing list? If so, please let me
> know (private e-mail works fine).
>
> Also, anyone (who's currently on the list) can feel free to let me know
> the specific project and company name(s) that they represent, along with
> authorization to mention those next time this is brought up on the list.
I don't represent anybody in particular (and it's not clear if I'm
even really here, tonight just happened to be the first time in months
I looked at this mailbox) but I have no objection in principle. Which
is easy for me to say. :-)
While (AFAIK) I'm still nominally netkit maintainer, I haven't had
any time to deal with it in ages.
--
David A. Holland dholland@....uk.linux.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Please check out the
xvendor mailing list charter.
