[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20031018192038.GA16125@mould.vormig.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 21:20:38 +0200
From: Tim van Erven <tve@...mig.net>
To: popa3d-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Virtual Domains
On Sat, 18/10/2003 23:04 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 08:51:24PM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote:
>> And in that case it would not be uncommon to use separate IPs for the
>> virtual mailservers for the domains,
>
> This is not uncommon, regardless of who administers the virtual mail
> servers. Some choose to do the virtualization IP-based (and this is
> what the code in virtual.c supports), some do it name-based (requiring
> that POP3 usernames of the form user@...ain are used).
Thanks, that explains why popa3d uses the IPs.
>> so the IP for the virtual
>> mailservers could be used in place of the "127.0.0.1" to differentiate
>> between domains?
>
> It's the only way it's meant to be setup. Your use of "127.0.0.1" is
> a hack. I'm not sure why it even works for you (all connections are
> somehow tunneled via localhost?)
I'm using stunnel to execute popa3d as a local inetd-type program.
Cheers,
--
Tim van Erven <tve@...mig.net> Fingerprint: F6C9 61EE 242C C012
OpenPGP Key ID: 712CB811 36D5 BBF8 6310 D557 712C B811
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
