popa3d-users - Re: Possible memory leak?

Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3E7BE96C.5020001@tagnet.ru>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 09:41:16 +0500
From: Boris Kovalenko <boris@...net.ru>
To:  popa3d-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Possible memory leak?

Solar Designer wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 11:35:18AM +0500, Boris Kovalenko wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
>  
>
>>I wonder Due adopting I have found that we are allocating memory for 
>>virtual_spool in virtual.c/virtual_userpass function but can't find 
>>where we free the allocation. This is memory leak bug or I misunderstand 
>>something?
>>    
>>
>
>This memory is really not freed anywhere, but the spool path may be
>needed for almost the entire lifetime of the process from that point
>on anyway.  So this is not a bug, this is intentional.
>
Hmmm... What to not do it in pop_root.c? For example with this type of code

#if !POP_STANDALONE && !POP_OPTIONS
int main(void)
{
        int rc;
        if (do_pop_startup()) return 1;
        rc = do_pop_session();
        if(virtual_spool != NULL)
           free(virtual_spool);
        return rc;
}
#endif

Also, the same code we may use in standalone.c when fork'ed. Isn't?

Boris

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.