|
Message-ID: <5a871bdd6b43d59bbcd87c5143ca5ac7@pricom.com.au> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:19:07 +1000 From: Philip Rhoades <phil@...com.com.au> To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com Subject: Re: First post - OWL looks really nice! - Q1 People, OK, I have made a little progress - this my current OWL VM ifcfg-eth0: DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static IPADDR=192.168.122.206 NETMASK=255.255.255.0 NETWORK=192.168.122.0 BROADCAST=192.168.122.255 GATEWAY=192.168.122.1 DNS1=192.168.122.1 and this allows me to ping and ssh into it from my F31 workstation but I still can't ping anything from it . . what am I missing? Thanks, Phil. On 2020-07-04 03:10, Philip Rhoades wrote: > People, > > I have been committed to RH and then Fedora since RH4 and FC1 for my > general purpose workstations and servers and I have always wanted a > Fedora Minimal iso - then when I went looking for non-systemd > Fedora-based stuff I found OWL! - this should be very interesting for > me. > > First Q - for networking I tried: > > 192.16.1.* > > (my LAN) and > > 192.16.122.* > > for the default virt-manager networking - I installed on a VM for a > first look but neither of those addressing schemes work - what do I > need to do to get the VM networking going? > > I am also interested in using OWL for podman containers - I presume > there will also be a networking issue there too? > > Thanks! > > Phil. -- Philip Rhoades PO Box 896 Cowra NSW 2794 Australia E-mail: phil@...com.com.au
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.