[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5200F3C4.7040109@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 17:01:56 +0400
From: Mikhail Shiposh <netsferato@...il.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
CC: gremlin@...mlin.ru
Subject: Re: OWL 2.6.18.348 and postfix distro.
On 05.08.2013 14:58, gremlin@...mlin.ru wrote:
> On 05-Aug-2013 14:47:44 +0400, misha shiposh wrote:
>
>> Good day guys, but i am tormented by one question, why in
>> Owl-current 2013/04/08 for 32-bit x86 we have old postfix distro ?
>> I mean postfix-2.4.15-owl2 Maybe the new versions of postfix are
>> unsecure? Maybe i should stay on old version postfix-2.4.15-owl2?
>
> The postfix-2.4.15-owl2 was checked and patched by our team members
> and is supposed to be a little more secure. Newer version weren't
> (yet).
>
>> What's the difference between postfix-2.4.15-owl1 and
>> postfix-2.4.15-owl2 ?
>
> Try looking at the changelog... :-)
Ok,
>> For info, http://www.postfix.org/announcements.html Already have
>> Postfix 2.10 stable release.
>
> You are welcome to try it. However, you may also prefer not to use it
> for the user-accessible /usr/sbin/sendmail, but install something
> like msmtp instead:
You know, for me it does not metter what to use sendmail or something
else. If you say that msmtp is better and more secure, so ok i will use it.
Can you tell me, maybe your postfix team can take a look at new version
and make it little more secure too? And i hope that ldap/mysql modules
will be there on next release?
I use owl as mail relay at least on 4 server and 3 organizations. And
Updating owl with all packages makes difficult, because i must rebuild
every time postfix.
Truly yours,
Mikhail /netsferato
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
