[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPLrYER3uWWD8zO+9S+QYAQ+tR_PN5VqTd59TbVz=X9u2OHzmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:46:01 +0100
From: Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegielka@...il.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: virtualization in openwall
2013/1/3 Zenny <garbytrash@...il.com>:
> Zdrasdsviche!
>
> Belated happy new year 2013 to all Owl team!
>
> BTW, I would like to know whether anyone has experience with
> virtualization like xen or kvm with xen in Owl?
KVM is a bad choice - another user-space issue. Thats why the qubes
developers decided to use xen (see qubes doc's).
> The reason I am asking is because a Polish distro Qubes-OS claims it
> is secured. And I could not find anything more secured than Owl. If
> xen or kvm with qemu be integrated to Owl, how will it scale in terms
> of performance and security?
>
> Any inputs would be appreciated! Spacibo bolshoi!
Qubes is a system for the desktop - Owl for servers. You can't easily
transfer qubes functions (eg copying etc.) to Owl... but J. Rutkowska
and Wojtczuk approach is very interesting.
Daniel
>
> /zenny
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
