[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A66A6B25DB59F429D1A3DB1751D284D6787302D7B@klss-08.int.krls.ru>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:00:57 +0400
From: Malykh Oleg <o.malykh@...s.ru>
To: "'owl-users@...ts.openwall.com'" <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: Kernel build and bonding
Dear Alexander,
Thank you very much!
Best regards
Oleg Malykh
IT Support Department
JSC "Martin Bauer Management"
Phone +7 495 7059376
Fax +7 495 7059373
gsm +7 916 1139938
o.malykh@...s.ru
-----Original Message-----
From: Solar Designer [mailto:solar@...nwall.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:38 PM
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [owl-users] Kernel build and bonding
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:52:46PM +0400, Malykh Oleg wrote:
> You right! When I've moved function bond_slave_override above function bond_xmit_roundrobin module compiled without any errors. Thank you very much.
You're welcome. JFYI, the new kernel in today's Owl-current snapshot is
compiled with CONFIG_BONDING=m (and the inlining issue patched). So if
you upgrade to this version, you shouldn't need to build a custom kernel.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
