[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <004e01c99002$62c43550$260010ac@hutmen.pl>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:47:04 +0100
From: "Radek Michalski" <radek@...yki.eu.org>
To: <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: RE: DNSSEC support
> Thus, dropping support of DNSSEC for the lifecycle of the next release of
Owl seemed like the right thing to do - and that's what we did.
>
> Now, I am curious - does anyone in here actually use DNSSEC? On Owl?
> Using our pre-built BIND?
Hi,
When about DNSSEC usage - I have only three installations running Owl where
DNSSEC is really used. As far as I remember, two of those were taken out of
the box, one I compilled by myself. That is since 2002.
Basing only on my example, I don't think that disabling DNSSEC support is
wrong thing.
Thanks for your answer and greetings
Radek
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail owl-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
