[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080316233907.GA17303@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:39:07 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: bug: sed segfaults
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:24:58PM +0300, (GalaxyMaster) wrote:
> > I've just encountered a bug in Owl sed and narrowed this bug down to the
> > shortest pattern that is triggering the bug:
Galaxy - thank you for revitalizing this mailing list. It does feel
wrong when all discussions occur on our private development list, with
this public one staying silent. Having some discussions in public may
encourage our actual users (who, unlike you, don't happen to be Owl
developers at the same time) to point out any issues and ask any
questions in public as well, rather than continue to approach us via
private e-mail...
Dmitry -
> > mother!galaxy:~$ sed '/^\(\)$/d' /dev/null
> > Segmentation fault
> > mother!galaxy:~$ sed --version | head -n1
> > GNU sed version 4.1.4
> > mother!galaxy:~$ rpm -q sed
> > sed-4.1.4-owl1
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:10:08PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Unable to reproduce with sed from -current:
> $ rpmquery sed
> sed-4.1.5-owl1
Same here - segfault on Owl 2.0-stable, nothing on -current. Given that
-current has been at 4.1.5-owl1 since Feb 20 2006, it should be safe to
sync the package in 2.0-stable to that version as well. I'd appreciate
it if you do that.
Thanks,
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: 5B341F15 fp: B3FB 63F4 D7A3 BCCC 6F6E FC55 A2FC 027C 5B34 1F15
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail owl-users-unsubscribe@...ts.openwall.com and reply
to the automated confirmation request that will be sent to you.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
