[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF96FDC1AF.3CA2DBFB-ONC1257164.0042668D-C1257164.0045C651@ssb-ag.de>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 14:43:25 +0200
From: "Tobias Roppelt" <Tobias.Roppelt@...l.ssb-ag.de>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Antwort: TCP-Tuning
You may give little more info.
"iptables -L -v" or
"ipchains -L -v" (whatever you use)
"ip route"
"arp"
"mii-tool -v <INT>"
"ifconfig <INT>"
"free -t"
"dmesg"
How is your gw connected to the local network (switch, hub, x-over)?
Tobias
|---------+----------------------------->
| | Bernhard Fischer |
| | <bernhard@...chli.|
| | org> |
| | |
| | 04.05.2006 13:07 |
| | Bitte antworten an|
| | owl-users |
| | |
|---------+----------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| An: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com |
| Kopie: |
| Thema: [owl-users] TCP-Tuning |
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Problem: while transfering data through a dual-hosted-nat gateway,
bandwidth differs about factor 5..10 instead of direct connections.
1. scenarion: single machine
- machine directly connected to the internet
- transfering 10MB of data within 10 seconds
so far, so good!
2. scenario: gateway
- two lan-interfaces (WAN: 10Mbit, LAN: 100Mbit)
- transfering 10MB of data through the gateway within 122 seconds ?!?
How do i have to configure both lan-interfaces for best throughput?
When i look at the traffic-statistiks, there is a gap of 200ms silence
followed by 300ms transmission. Why?
Any help or hints are very welcome!
Greetings
Bernhard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
