[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43FCF248.2040002@op5.se>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:22:48 +0100
From: Andreas Ericsson <ae@....se>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: owl 2 bind for 1.1
Solar Designer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:02:02PM +0100, Stanislav wrote:
>
>>i would like to build owl2's bind on a owl1.1 system.
>>
>>Is there any issues ?
>
>
> I am not aware of specific issues, but this has not been tested and is
> unsupported by us.
>
There is the (rather ridiculous) dependency on sysklogd >= 1.4.1-owl9
(or owl8). Stanislav, you can remove that Requires: line in the
spec-file and rebuild, but be aware that you won't get any logs from it.
Other than that, I agree with Solar. You should upgrade to 2.0 rather
than backporting things to 1.1.
--
Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@....se
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
