[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20050515113755.GA4827@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 15:37:55 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Courier-Imap server on Owl
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:09:43PM +0400, Melekhov Alexandre A. wrote:
> > Why use Courier and not dovecot, though?
>
> Once I use dovecot for IMAP service. Don't remember exactly why, but I did not like it at all.
>
> Why did you ask about it? Is it better?
Unlike Courier, it's designed for security and thus is more in line
with Owl. I think it is also not limited to Maildirs for storage.
If we'd ever include IMAP into Owl, dovecot is the primary candidate.
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
