[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20041125151500.GB2020@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:15:00 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Owl-current moved to glibc 2.3.x
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 03:24:53PM +0300, Maxim Timofeyev wrote:
> On Tue 09 Nov 2004 04:09 Solar Designer wrote:
> [skip]
> > > libcrypto.so.0.9.6 is needed by (installed) nmap-3.48-owl2
> [skip]
> > > libssl.so.0.9.6 is needed by (installed) nmap-3.48-owl2
>
> > Yes, this is one of the known bugs in our current rpm package. It
> > should be fixed as a part of this TODO item:
[...]
> Why don't we use openssl-compat-fake for openssl upgrade, similarly to glibc
> by adding Provides: libcrypto.so.0.9.6 и libssl.so.0.9.6?
There should be no need. As I have mentioned, the above is caused by
a bug in rpm, not by our not satisfying any dependencies.
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar at openwall.com>
GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
