[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20040615190058.GA1754@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:00:58 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: crash
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:46:26PM +0200, Krzychu wrote:
> it seems that this code:
[...]
> executed by normal user can really crash our owl boxes.
Yes.
> Fix of the problem is aviable at:
> http://linuxreviews.org/news/2004-06-11_kernel_crash/24_kernel_ia32-and-x86_64-fix-fpu-state.patch.txt
Correct.
And this is one of the fixes already included in 2.4.26-ow2pre2 (it's
not public). Do you feel it's worth releasing an -ow2 right away,
knowing that there will be more important fixes by early July and an
-ow3 will be needed? I've been holding this incomplete set of fixes
for now...
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar@...nwall.com>
GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
