|
Message-Id: <s099f222.087@gw.nebcoinc.com> Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 08:06:35 -0500 From: "Steve Bremer" <steveb@...coinc.com> To: <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: How Owl is better from "other leading linux distributions"? >>I don't know about SuSE, but RedHat holds convenience over security in its priorities. Owl does not. SuSE is similar. >>Owl has a variety of 'quirks' that makes programs work in a securityenhanced way. For instance, every user has its own tmpdir, and with the tcb password scheme a lot of suid root binaries has been 'demoted' to sgid shadow instead, which ofcourse is far preferrable. This is a good point, although I would call them 'features' instead of 'quirks'. ;-) Before switching from RH to Owl, I used to have a checklist of over 100 items that I would do to each RH machine to help harden it. It was such a pleasant surprise when I switched to Owl and discovered that most (can't remember the exact count now) of the items in my check list were already done. This is one of the many reasons I prefer Owl. Others follow below: -Easier to create a minimal install -The choice of software for network services (vsftpd instead of wu-ftpd, OpenSSH, postfix instead of sendmail, modified versions of telnet and dhcpd that run with privsep, etc.) -Many (most?) of the packages in Owl have custom patches applied to help reduce security risks (temp file handling fixes, etc). -The security work that the Openwall Project does benefits all Linux distros since their security fixes are passed on to the package maintainers. So, by supporting the Openwall Project, you are helping to improve security for everyone who utilizes that software. -Slow, steady, safe, reliable development cycle. -As Andreas pointed out: "Security over features" I hope this helps. Steve Bremer NEBCO, Inc. Systems & Security Administrator
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.