|
Message-Id: <s0865b4d.034@gw.nebcoinc.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:29:41 -0500 From: "Steve Bremer" <steveb@...coinc.com> To: <owl-users@...ts.openwall.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.26-ow1, 2.0.40-ow1; new Owl ISO; Owl 1.1-stable Hi, >> However, >>and I'm still trying to find an answer to this myself, it may be that a >> kernel that is compiled without CONFIG_IP_MULTICAST is not vulnerable. >Unfortunately, it does not appear so. Thanks for the confirmation SD. I was hoping kernels without mcast support weren't affected since it's an mcast related option where the bug occurs. Steve Bremer NEBCO, Inc. Systems & Security Administrator -- Alexander Peslyak <solar@...nwall.com> GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598 http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.