[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030916210416.GA16798@openwall.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 01:04:16 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: iproute2 & iputils fail to compile
Hi Steve,
Thank you for the report.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 03:48:37PM -0500, Steve Bremer wrote:
> While building a new machine, I ran into troubles getting the above
> packages to compile. They are being compiled against a 2.4.22 kernel
> source tree. I thought the BUILD doc used to say that a 2.2 kernel
> tree was required to build user land, but the latest BUILD doc says a
> 2.2 or 2.4 kernel will work. Is a 2.2 kernel tree still required to
> build user land?
No, either 2.2.x or 2.4.x should do. (But the produced binaries are
slightly different. In particular, you only get Large File Support if
you build against 2.4.x.)
> Both packages are returning the same error messages. I've included
> the relevant parts of the iproute2 build log below:
> /usr/include/linux/in.h:140: field `gr_group' has incomplete type
> /usr/include/linux/in.h:146: field `gsr_group' has incomplete type
> /usr/include/linux/in.h:147: field `gsr_source' has incomplete type
> /usr/include/linux/in.h:153: field `gf_group' has incomplete type
> /usr/include/linux/in.h:156: field `gf_slist' has incomplete type
> These are the only two packages that failed (besides the arch
> specific ones).
Something broke between 2.4.21 and 2.4.22. I can reproduce this now,
and will deal with it.
Meanwhile, you can try with 2.4.21-ow2.
--
Alexander Peslyak <solar@...nwall.com>
GPG key ID: B35D3598 fp: 6429 0D7E F130 C13E C929 6447 73C3 A290 B35D 3598
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
