[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lm0hl5nm.fsf@lizard.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:12:29 +0100
From: Maciek Pasternacki <maciekp@...hy.fnord.org>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: /usr/include/{linux,asm}
Why /usr/include/linux and /usr/include/asm in Owl are symlinks and
not copies of headers against which glibc was built? Shouldn't these
be part of glibc package, or at least be independent from whatever
goes into /usr/src/linux?
According to what Linus says in
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html ,
symlinking /usr/include/{linux,asm} to /usr/src/linux is considered
harmful.
--
__ Maciek Pasternacki <maciekp@...hy.fnord.org> [ http://japhy.fnord.org/ ]
`| _ |_\ / { ...I only laughed away your tears,
,|{-}|}| }\/ but even jesters cry... }
\/ |____/ ( Fish ) -><-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
