Follow @Openwall on Twitter for new release announcements and other news
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030202000531.GA12790@openwall.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:05:31 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: probably a typo in rpm macros

On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 07:02:51PM +0300, Oleg Lukashin wrote:

Hi,

> 	I'm not sure it's fixed in Owl-currient, but in
> Owl 1.0 not. file /usr/lib/rpm/macros, string:
> %{?__libtoolize:[ -f configure.in ] && %{__libtoolize} --copy --force} ; \
> 
> but should be
> 
> .... && %{__libtoolize} --copy --force ;} \
> 
> if not, than "%undefine __libtoolize" in spec file will stop
> building because there is ";" left in script.

Thanks for the report.  This is not fixed in Owl yet, but we'll get a
fix in.

I'll be leaving for a trip to Europe in just a few hours, primarily to
speak on Owl at FOSDEM (http://www.fosdem.org) in Brussels next Sunday.
I won't always have Internet connectivity during the trip.  This means
that the publicly-available Owl-current snapshots and the anoncvs view
of our repository will be frozen for the next two weeks.  I find this
delay acceptable and thus don't delegate this task to someone else from
our team. :-)

-- 
/sd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.