[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20021121142342.GC30041@router.rega.ru>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 17:23:42 +0300
From: Oleg Lukashin <phd@...a.ru>
To: owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: make buildworld troubles
* Solar Designer (solar@...nwall.com) wrote:
> Then the files under it aren't or the kernel hasn't been configured.
> In another message you said you didn't build it, but did you configure
> it? The minimum that needs to be done is a "make menuconfig", you may
> leave everything at defaults, but you do need to run it and save the
> configuration.
Ohh, I see. so, path to kernel sources should be /usr/src/linux, yes ?
> It is recommended that you do kernel configuration and builds as user
> "sources", too.
why then documentation says it should be done from "build" user ?
> > Also, why there is no packet named bind in 1.0 release ?
>
> Because we didn't yet invest the time into making it match our
> requirements for an Owl package (and it's much more than just the
> packaging). This clearly needs to be done.
I understand.
> > what is the best way to compile bind, can i find spec for bind somewhere ?
>
> There're several alternatives to choose from:
>
> 1. Pick and use binary packages from Red Hat Linux 6.2 updates. Or
> rebuild them from SRPMs, but it doesn't make much of a difference.
> This is the easiest.
is there is any difference between RedHat's and Owl's
directory structure in case using packets such as bind or apache for example?
> 2. Use BIND 4.9.x-OW, setting up its chroot jail manually (there's an
> explanation of how this may be done).
You mean patch or tarball ? if tar, where it can be found ?
> --
> /sd
--
Best regards,
Oleg Lukashin
mailto:phd@...a.ru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
