[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20020729200330.C1055@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 20:03:30 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: Janusz <januz@....uni.torun.pl>, owl-users@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: tftp -- suggestion please
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:42:12PM +0200, Janusz wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, I didn't get around to replying, and I guess most other list
members (129 currently) didn't have much to suggest you as well.
> just wan't to tell that finally (?) I decided to hire atftpd.
> The main reason is, it is able to hold _many_ simultaneous connection
> without special difficulties. That's very useful in my case (labs for
> students, where all the PCs are booting almost at the same time).
>
> Unfortunately, I'm not able to run it controlled by supervise.
> It has some trouble with --no-fork option.
Why do you avoid *inetd's by so much? I personally would probably
just hack the old tftpd to properly drop privileges and run it off
xinetd (even though it's something I hope we'll replace eventually).
--
/sd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
