[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7cc3b161-c4f0-f51b-a123-c1de98bff03d@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 21:01:02 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Cc: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: 32-bit syscall breakage in -431 kernel with KAISER
On 06/28/2018 04:16 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:08:29PM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
>> On 06/26/2018 10:13 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
>>> per my review of the full struct tss_struct, the stack[] field
>>> offset is:
>>>
>>> 4+8*5+4*2+2*2+1025*8+8 = 8264
>>
>> Alexander,
>> seems you're wrong
>>
>> in my version of rhel5-based -123.1 kernel
>>
>> crash> tss_struct -o
>> struct tss_struct {
>> [0x0] u32 reserved1;
>> [0x4] u64 rsp0;
>> [0xc] u64 rsp1;
>> [0x14] u64 rsp2;
>> [0x1c] u64 reserved2;
>> [0x24] u64 ist[7];
>> [0x5c] u32 reserved3;
>> [0x60] u32 reserved4;
>> [0x64] u16 reserved5;
>> [0x66] u16 io_bitmap_base;
>> [0x68] unsigned long io_bitmap[1025];
>> [0x2070] unsigned long stack_canary;
>> [0x2078] unsigned long stack[64];
>> }
>> SIZE: 0x3000
>> crash> tss_struct -od
>> struct tss_struct {
>> [0] u32 reserved1;
>> [4] u64 rsp0;
>> [12] u64 rsp1;
>> [20] u64 rsp2;
>> [28] u64 reserved2;
>> [36] u64 ist[7];
>> [92] u32 reserved3;
>> [96] u32 reserved4;
>> [100] u16 reserved5;
>> [102] u16 io_bitmap_base;
>> [104] unsigned long io_bitmap[1025];
>> [8304] unsigned long stack_canary;
>> [8312] unsigned long stack[64];
>> }
>> SIZE: 12288
>>
>> Seems you missed that 'ist' filed is an array
>
> Ah, yes, indeed. But since it has an odd number of elements, this
> leaves stack[] just as unaligned.
>
> Can you check your RHEL6-based kernels as well?
crash> tss_struct -o
struct tss_struct {
[0] struct x86_hw_tss x86_tss;
[128] unsigned long io_bitmap[1025];
[8328] unsigned long stack_canary;
[8336] unsigned long stack[64];
}
SIZE: 12288
crash> tss_struct -ox
struct tss_struct {
[0x0] struct x86_hw_tss x86_tss;
[0x80] unsigned long io_bitmap[1025];
[0x2088] unsigned long stack_canary;
[0x2090] unsigned long stack[64];
}
SIZE: 0x3000
struct x86_hw_tss {
} __attribute__((packed)) ____cacheline_aligned;
So, looks like RHEL6 based kernels are properly aligned
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
