[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150112115841.GA10247@gremlin.ru>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:58:41 +0300
From: gremlin@...mlin.ru
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: Re: [owl-users] Owl 3.1-stable
On 2015-01-11 20:02:20 +0300, croco@...nwall.com wrote:
>>> Such ability is good for people who prefer to do everything
>>> manually.
>> The primary reason for doing that was the need to build more
>> complex configurations than a single ethernet link.
> Well, it is possible to have as many interfaces as you want
> without the need of overriding the Owl default networking startup;
> However, I perfectly understand you: more automation always means
> less flexibility.
Yes. That's why I'd recommend leave it for trivial configurations,
and allow overriding it for complex systems.
TWIMBI: now I'm administering over a hundred of physical servers
at 7 different locations - so I think I've got a bit more close
to understanding of what do our users really need :-)
--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin <gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru>
GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
