[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130324212811.2EC6.0@paddy.troja.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 21:35:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Pavel Kankovsky <peak@...o.troja.mff.cuni.cz>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: strace
On Sat, 23 Mar 2013, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Who could suppose at the time of adding PTRACE_GETREGS support that the
> structure returned by PTRACE_GETREGS on 2.6.18-based i386 kernel is not
> "struct pt_regs" from kernel's <asm/ptrace.h> but
> "struct user_regs_struct" from libc's <sys/user.h>?
Well, the description of PTRACE_GETREGS in ptrace(2) says "See
<linux/user.h> for information on the format of this data." Moreover,
struct user_regs_struct is the format you'd get from PTRACE_PEEKUSER if
you enumerated all relevant offsets.
--
Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak / Jeremiah 9:21 \
"For death is come up into our MS Windows(tm)..." \ 21st century edition /
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
