|
|
Message-ID: <20120812175435.GA32255@albatros>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 21:54:35 +0400
From: Vasily Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: protected_{symlinks,hardlinks,fifos}
Solar,
The patch implementing protected_{symlinks,hardlinks} was backported from the
upstream kernel. Almost the same way protected_fifos was implemented (ala
HARDEN_FIFO). They work well.
The question here is -- what defaults should be for OpenVZ containers:
on, off, or inherit CT0's value?
My opinion is default on, the same with CT0 (which runs Owl).
--
Vasily
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use? Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia and check out these guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.