[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120508191050.GA16957@openwall.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 23:10:50 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: keytab-lilo
Hi,
We happen to have three source files for / different implementations of
keytab-lilo in Owl:
1. Perl script coming from upstream LILO.
2. C implementation found in our native tree, in the LILO package.
3. Perl script coming from upstream SYSLINUX.
Right now, #1 happens to make it into the lilo binary package, #2 is
built but is not installed (looks like a lilo.spec bug), and #3 is
packaged into syslinux-perl, which is not on default installorder.conf
(may only be installed manually). Additionally, the current lilo binary
package has the script in /usr/sbin/keytab-lilo, whereas syslinux-perl
has it in /usr/bin/keytab-lilo.
I am going to exclude /usr/bin/keytab-lilo from packaging into
syslinux-perl for now, but we need to decide on which one(?) of the
three implementations to be packaging and which of the two directories
to install it into. Any suggestions? I am not familiar with
keytab-lilo - I think I've never used it. So I also don't care much,
but I'd like to clean this up.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
