[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAATLsPbMZax79LTgfU2+nscV_MttO1T02GMGw3ZmxXjzdP-FaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:05:55 +0200
From: Paweł Hajdan, Jr. <phajdan.jr@...il.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: owl and openssh
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:25, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com> wrote:
> The task is not trivial because we have patches,
> some of which will need to remain in the updated package (e.g., the key
> blacklisting). The updated package may also need to be re-tested for a
> variety of potential issues, such as timing leaks allowing for easy
> username probing (an issue that we previously patched, but that might
> not have been addressed upstream).
>
Just jumping in while I'm still subscribed. :)
Isn't upstream interested in those owl patches? Have they been submitted
and rejected?
Content of type "text/html" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
