[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120220125353.GA18825@openwall.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:53:53 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: glibc update: rpm && coreutils
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 03:20:54PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> I have plenty of pending minor fixes of packages to be buildable under glibc 2.14.1
> and binutils upgrade - glibc on x86_64 is not buildable under binutils of
> Owl-current.
>
> Should I send all of them before the ISO generation, IOW, now?
I am trying to find time to make certain other changes to Owl (such as
for specific issues reported by users - mostly off-list to me,
unfortunately). If I manage to do that soon enough, then I'd rather not
add extra changes to this same pool - that is, your changes related to
new glibc should better be postponed until after the next set of ISOs.
However, if I fail to find time for that this week anyway, then I'll ask
you to go ahead and commit the glibc-related changes - and I'll work on
more changes at once later.
Summary: please hold these for now. But you may, of course, post them
in here for discussion - if you feel that any discussion might be needed.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
