[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120211152539.GA20310@openwall.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:25:39 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: -Wl,-z,now (was: %optflags for new gcc)
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:13:38PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 13:59 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > In case we enable -Wl,-z,now as gcc default, how do we (or our users)
> > disable it on individual occasions? For relro, there's norelro - but is
> > there a nonow?
>
> It is -z,lazy.
Oh, indeed. We need to document our changed defaults and ways to
override them prominently.
> > Or should we even patch our dynamic linker such that it'd assume
> > LD_BIND_NOW for SUID/SGIDs?
>
> That's a good idea.
...except that suexec specifically might be intentionally built without
-z now.
Anyway, I don't really mind. Let's proceed.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
