[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120209145121.GB29533@albatros>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:51:21 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: -Wl,-z,now (was: %optflags for new gcc)
Hi Gilles,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:18 +0100, Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> That's doable to have a nonow option when patching the specs like in
> http://ipcop.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipcop/ipcop/trunk/src/patches/gcc-4.4.5_fpie-1.patch?view=log
> Patch was borrowed as is from HLFS.
Thank you for the information!
However, I hesitate introducing -z,nonow as an alias to -z,lazy - Owl
is not so widespread to introduce such trivial new args. IMHO it would
confuse new users/developers rather than simplify spec files.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
