[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120202021629.GA10532@openwall.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 06:16:29 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gcc: relro patch
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 11:52:22PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 23:33 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:45:19PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> > > gcc-default-relro.diff
> > > # DP: Turn on -Wl,-z,relro by default.
>
> Enabled this patch (not in %optflags, but in the patch as we have no flags
> passed to gcc in some cases). Trying to rebuild world, all seems OK. I'll
> post an update tomorrow when it is finished for both i686 and x86_64.
Is there much point in testing this patch alone? I thought we had
decided to make several more changes to gcc at once. Re-read the thread
maybe? And perhaps I should do the same... It's been a while.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
