[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111109131632.GA26170@albatros>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:16:32 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: missing $(CFLAGS) in several specs
Solar,
I've changed optflags in .rpmmacros and checked whether packages
really use it. The result:
build@...atros:~ $ grep gcc logs/* | grep -v -- -Wl,-z,now | grep -v ':checking' | cut -d: -f1 | uniq | wc -l
grep: logs/installisotree: Permission denied
grep: logs/installvztree: Permission denied
grep: logs/installworld: Permission denied
119
build@...atros:~ $ ls logs/* | wc -l
168
2/3 packages don't always use our %optflags.
The most frequent case (example):
$(PROGS) $(PROGSUID): $(OBJS)
$(CC) -o $(@) $(OBJS) $(LIBS) -L../../common/lib -L../lib -l$(TAGDIR) -lsimpleapps
logs/SimplePAMApps:gcc -o passwd passwd.o -lpam -lpam_misc -ldl -L../../common/lib -L../lib -lpamapps -lsimpleapps
No LDFLAGS or CFLAGS. What's the right pattern for the linkage
invocation of gcc? Does it need additional $(LDFLAGS) and $(CFLAGS) or
only $(LDFLAGS)?
--
Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
