[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111028115030.GB2848@gremlin.ru>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:50:30 +0400
From: gremlin@...mlin.ru
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: syslinux
On 28-Oct-2011 15:23:26 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > > > Oh, the main question: do we need to keep an ability to
> > > > build ISO with lilo or we've completely moved to ISOLINUX?
> > > My intent is to completely move to ISOLINUX for our ISOs (but
> > > keep LILO in Owl for optional use on installed systems).
> > I think we should start using ISOLINUX for ISOs, but still use
> > LILO on installed systems by default - that will be the least
> > impact for existing systems during upgrade.
> Yes, that's what we should do for now. Possibly moving away from
> LILO for installed systems is a separate change anyway.
It really is - and, therefore, it should be optional.
--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
<gremlin ПРИ gremlin ТЧК ru>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
