[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111028112326.GA12043@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:23:26 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: syslinux
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 02:51:26PM +0400, gremlin@...mlin.ru wrote:
> On 28-Oct-2011 14:42:30 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
>
> > > Oh, the main question: do we need to keep an ability to build
> > > ISO with lilo or we've completely moved to ISOLINUX?
>
> > My intent is to completely move to ISOLINUX for our ISOs (but
> > keep LILO in Owl for optional use on installed systems).
>
> I think we should start using ISOLINUX for ISOs, but still use
> LILO on installed systems by default - that will be the least
> impact for existing systems during upgrade.
Yes, that's what we should do for now. Possibly moving away from LILO
for installed systems is a separate change anyway.
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
