[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024173228.GA17640@albatros>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:32:28 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: multiarch (was: mpc, gmp, mpfr, gcc .specs)
Solar,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 13:21 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> Can you also introduce the gmp.h and gmp-mparam.h wrappers from Fedora
> for multilib? My understanding is that we need those in case a user of
> Owl wants to install both i686 and x86_64 builds of GMP on the same Owl
> userland.
Done. I wonder whether we need similar fixes for other *-devel rpms.
> We partially support such multilib installs, and it'd make
> sense for us to improve/complete support for them.
Agreed! There are some current discussions about standartization
arch-dependant pathes for libs, debug files, headers, libraries, etc. I
think we should reuse as much as possible from other distros. AFAIK,
Debian is the first distro with true multiach:
http://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch
--
Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
