[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111016162338.GA5388@albatros>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:23:39 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gcc 4.6.1
Solar,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 20:12 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> Given your recent commits, what's the readiness status for Owl moving to
> gcc 4.6.1? What packages still fail to build, if any?
In the first buildworld run all packages are buildable on x86_64. On
i386 glibc still fails (an assembler issue).
> Are there any known runtime issues with Owl packages rebuilt with gcc
> 4.6.1?
Currently the rebuilded groff segfaults. The issue is somewhere in glibc
symbol table (__sincos() calls itself forever). I'm afraid there will
be more such weird issues - we should update glibc itself soon.
I'll likely change glibc fix - patch "inline" instances instead of
passing -fgnu89-inline in CFLAGS.
> And what testing did you perform? Perhaps just multiple
> buildworld iterations?
Yes, I'll test it this way.
> Also, can you please post your updated gcc.spec, along with info on any
> issues with it (what you think remains to be done, etc.) such that we
> can prepare it for commit? Are you packaging gcc's new files, such as
> the libgomp stuff?
I'll post spec files tomorrow (there are minor issues I'll fix myself).
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
