[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110908151754.GB16805@albatros>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:17:54 +0400
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gcc 4.6.1
Solar, Daniel,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 16:54 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 02:46:34PM +0200, Daniel Cegie?ka wrote:
> > What version of glibc you plan to use?
>
> 2.14 or whatever latest release at the time Vasiliy gets to update our
> glibc package.
>
> It'd be nice if Vasiliy manages to get the gcc update in first, without
> updating glibc yet - just as a development milestone. But if this turns
> out to be difficult, then updating gcc and glibc at once is acceptable.
Yes, it would be nice. If the changes can be divided into separate
changes, they become not so difficult to understand. Big changes
might indicate about some hidden issues.
> > I have gentoo with owl patches
> > and many diffs I use with glibc-2.12. I have a problem with compiling
> > sanitize-env.diff (glibc-2.12 and gcc-4.6.1). And there is a problem
> > with perl-5.8.8 compilation with glibc-2.14 and gcc-4.6.1... perl-5.10
> > works ok.
>
> Feel free to share these patches for Vasiliy's review/consideration.
This would be great :)
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
