[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E5B771E.3020204@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:25:18 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: initrd/udev in Owl?
On 29.08.2011 14:46, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
[]
>>> except (2).
>>
>> Yes, (2) is serious (I trust your description of it; I am not familiar
>> with this myself).
>
> I don't know whether it can be disabled. If yes, it is a way to go.
>
>
> FWIW, as to hard drives - the stable naming for fstab can be obtained
> two ways:
>
> 1) UUID for partitions.
>
> 2) symlinks created by udev and used in fstab instead /dev/sda1.
>
> AFAIK, all modern distros do (1).
Which, in turn, is implemented using (2): current libblkid (from util-linux)
looks into /dev/disk/by-uuid/ first and falls back to partition scanning if
that directory is not present.
The same is true for modern initramfs too - like dracut for example (which
is currently the only real choice for initramfs generator, and which may
produce either universal or specific initramfs images).
/mjt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
