[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110603190350.GA514@openwall.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:03:50 +0400
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Cc: Eugene Teo <eugeneteo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: add mount options to sysfs (was: segoon's status report - #1 of 15)
Vasiliy,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:38:41PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote:
> I've added mount option printing in /proc/mounts and tested different
> remount situations.
Sounds/looks good.
> Solar, I'm waiting for your response re: mode usefullness. Then I'll
> try to post the patch to LKML one more time.
I think that having both umask= and mode= is not needed for sysfs and
debugfs. I think umask= should be left, mode= removed.
If I understood correctly, with your implementation (current patch),
umask applies when entries are created initially, and mode on chmod().
If so, mode should simply be gone.
I'll start a new thread for procfs. Of these, I mostly care about
procfs, because it is of immediate relevance to Owl.
Thanks,
Alexander
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
