[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DDC34CE.3070605@fsck-labs.exploits-bg.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 01:44:30 +0300
From: Georgi Geshev <root@...k-labs.exploits-bg.com>
To: owl-dev@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: gcc update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 5/6/2011 9:26 PM, Solar Designer wrote:
>
> For others in here - Georgi only did this test on i686 so far (not
> x86_64 yet). (That's fine, I merely want it mentioned.)
>
I've already done some `buildworld's for both i686 and x86_64
architectures and here's a list of the packages that fail to build -
* These are the packages that fail to build for both i686 and x86_64 -
cpio
db4
elfutils-libelf
flex
glibc
kernel
libtool
make
mdadm
perl
quota
shadow-utils
util-linux
vim
* And there's one more package that only fail to build for i686 -
pv
Additionally, there's a problem with the (latest) GCC RPM spec file -
there seems to be a lot of installed but unpackaged files and packaging
some of these may directly result in resolving some of `buildworld'
build issues.
I'm here with attaching a RPM build log excerpt concerning the
aforementioned issue.
Regards,
Georgi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN3DTKAAoJECp4GRJNSNT5UxsH+wZ2XEozgMCt3R5XSzGMrQkh
3zm1FGCD97AMzGl4SuUZDUiMjQS9IFBEJljjYYytUo7YkgyxrzdTTN72QaJToxIL
xKqnqnbNRwyUbGjUPq3a2kfM30PXBYTJokc6SmzF+rpacqY3G5vyzgUS3bEkyggO
cu3uLgvP2i1pal7hrUsyx3GUgO1go4cOpAzlZZB/BZOm5UA5341K0spS82WmUU5v
iIyD2FX+ZfE70MBeUSkTq7jZRaa2Bas4Fu/HbaJ23AAH6h65/6GG0PG1xvFs4yWe
r/L1HXMNujCl0Z/mKycF/+f9liyp+SETN9sIoLjf74xebSnLTt+krmt/2sSpDi8=
=Qtfa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
View attachment "Installed-but-unpackaged-files-found.txt" of type "text/plain" (11939 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
Confused about mailing lists and their use?
Read about mailing lists on Wikipedia
and check out these
guidelines on proper formatting of your messages.
